Phase Noise in Frequency Synthesizers
1. Definition and Importance of Phase Noise
Definition and Importance of Phase Noise
Phase noise is a critical metric in the characterization of frequency synthesizers and oscillators, quantifying the short-term random fluctuations in the phase of a signal. Mathematically, it is described as the spectral density of phase deviations, typically expressed in units of dBc/Hz (decibels relative to the carrier per hertz bandwidth). The instantaneous output voltage of an ideal oscillator can be represented as:
where A is the amplitude, f0 is the nominal frequency, and ϕ(t) represents the phase noise. In practical systems, ϕ(t) is a stochastic process arising from thermal noise, flicker noise, and other non-ideal effects.
Time-Domain vs. Frequency-Domain Representation
Phase noise manifests differently in time and frequency domains. In the time domain, it appears as jitter—a deviation in the zero-crossing times of the signal. In the frequency domain, it is observed as sidebands around the carrier frequency. The single-sideband phase noise ℒ(f) is defined as:
where Sϕ(f) is the power spectral density of phase fluctuations, and f is the offset frequency from the carrier.
Sources of Phase Noise
Phase noise in frequency synthesizers arises from several mechanisms:
- Thermal noise (white noise) – Contributes a flat noise floor, proportional to kT.
- Flicker noise (1/f noise) – Dominates at low offset frequencies due to active device imperfections.
- Nonlinearities in oscillators – Amplitude-to-phase conversion introduces additional noise.
- Reference oscillator noise – Phase-locked loops (PLLs) amplify reference noise near the carrier.
Importance in Practical Systems
Phase noise degrades system performance in multiple ways:
- Communications – Increases bit error rate (BER) in digital modulation schemes (e.g., QAM, OFDM).
- Radar systems – Reduces resolution and dynamic range due to spectral spreading.
- Clock distribution networks – Introduces timing uncertainty in high-speed digital circuits.
- Frequency synthesizers – Limits spectral purity, affecting adjacent channel rejection.
For example, in a wireless receiver, excessive phase noise in the local oscillator (LO) can lead to reciprocal mixing, where strong adjacent signals downconvert into the desired channel bandwidth. The resulting signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) degradation is given by:
where Pint is the interferer power, Psig is the desired signal power, and foffset is the frequency separation between the interferer and the carrier.
Measurement and Characterization
Phase noise is typically measured using a spectrum analyzer or dedicated phase noise analyzer. Key parameters include:
- Carrier offset range – From near-carrier (1 Hz to 1 kHz) to far-out (1 MHz to 100 MHz).
- Integrated phase jitter – Calculated by integrating ℒ(f) over a specified bandwidth.
- Residual phase noise – Isolates synthesizer noise from the reference source.
Modern instruments employ cross-correlation techniques to suppress measurement noise, enabling sub-dBc/Hz accuracy.

Phase Noise vs. Jitter
Phase noise and jitter are two closely related metrics describing the short-term instability of a frequency synthesizer's output signal. While both quantify timing uncertainty, they are expressed in different domains: phase noise in the frequency domain (dBc/Hz) and jitter in the time domain (seconds). Understanding their relationship is critical for designing high-performance systems, particularly in communications, radar, and high-speed data converters.
Mathematical Relationship
The root-mean-square (RMS) jitter σt can be derived from the phase noise spectrum L(f) by integrating the single-sideband phase noise over the offset frequency range of interest:
where f0 is the carrier frequency, and f1 to f2 define the integration bandwidth. This equation assumes the phase noise is dominated by random fluctuations (white noise) and neglects deterministic components like spurs.
Domain-Specific Interpretations
Phase noise is typically measured using a spectrum analyzer and represents the power spectral density of phase fluctuations. It is particularly useful for analyzing oscillator performance in RF systems, where spectral purity is critical. For example, in a 10 GHz synthesizer, phase noise at 1 MHz offset might be -110 dBc/Hz.
Jitter, measured in picoseconds or femtoseconds, is more relevant for digital systems where timing accuracy matters. Total jitter comprises random jitter (Gaussian distribution) and deterministic jitter (bounded). In high-speed SerDes applications, sub-100 fs RMS jitter is often required for error-free operation.
Practical Conversion Between Metrics
Engineers frequently need to convert between these metrics. For a synthesizer with a phase noise profile dominated by 1/f and white noise regions:
- Divide the phase noise spectrum into piecewise linear regions (e.g., 1/f3, 1/f2, 1/f0)
- Integrate each region separately using the appropriate power-law relationship
- Sum the contributions and apply the conversion factor 1/(2πf0)
For instance, a 1 GHz clock with integrated phase noise of -40 dBc from 10 kHz to 10 MHz offset would exhibit approximately 1 ps RMS jitter.
System-Level Implications
In phase-locked loops (PLLs), the choice between optimizing for phase noise or jitter depends on the application:
- Wireless systems prioritize close-in phase noise (≤1 MHz offset) to minimize adjacent channel interference
- High-speed data converters focus on broadband jitter (integrated from ~10 kHz to Nyquist) as it directly impacts SNR
- Radar systems require both excellent close-in phase noise for Doppler resolution and low broadband jitter for accurate pulse timing
The loop bandwidth of a PLL serves as a critical design parameter that affects both metrics differently. Increasing loop bandwidth typically reduces VCO-dominated close-in phase noise but may degrade broadband jitter due to increased reference noise contribution.

1.3 Units and Measurement of Phase Noise
Phase Noise Definition and Units
Phase noise quantifies the short-term random fluctuations in the phase of a signal, typically expressed in the frequency domain. The standard unit of phase noise is decibels relative to the carrier per Hertz (dBc/Hz), which represents the noise power in a 1 Hz bandwidth at a specified offset frequency from the carrier, normalized to the carrier power.
Here, Pnoise(foffset) is the noise power in a 1 Hz bandwidth at an offset frequency foffset from the carrier, and Pcarrier is the total carrier power. The logarithmic scale allows for convenient representation of noise levels that can span several orders of magnitude.
Measurement Techniques
Phase noise is typically measured using a spectrum analyzer or a phase noise analyzer. The two primary methods are:
- Direct Spectrum Measurement: The spectrum analyzer captures the power spectral density (PSD) of the signal, and phase noise is derived by normalizing the noise power at a given offset to the carrier power.
- Phase Detector Method: A reference signal with lower phase noise is compared with the device under test (DUT) using a phase detector. The resulting phase fluctuations are analyzed to compute ℒ(f).
Single-Sideband vs. Double-Sideband Phase Noise
Phase noise can be reported as single-sideband (SSB) or double-sideband (DSB). SSB phase noise (ℒ(f)) considers noise on only one side of the carrier, while DSB accounts for both upper and lower sidebands. For symmetric noise profiles, DSB noise is approximately 3 dB higher than SSB.
Impact of Measurement Bandwidth
The choice of resolution bandwidth (RBW) in a spectrum analyzer affects phase noise measurement accuracy. A narrower RBW provides better noise floor sensitivity but increases measurement time. For precise measurements, the RBW should be significantly smaller than the offset frequency of interest.
Phase Noise to Jitter Conversion
In time-domain applications, phase noise is often converted to jitter, which quantifies timing uncertainty. The root-mean-square (RMS) jitter σt is obtained by integrating the phase noise spectrum:
where f0 is the carrier frequency, and f1 and f2 define the integration bandwidth.
Practical Considerations in Measurement
When measuring phase noise, key factors include:
- Reference Source Quality: The reference signal must have lower phase noise than the DUT to avoid contamination.
- Isolation and Shielding: External interference (e.g., power supply noise or crosstalk) must be minimized.
- Calibration: The measurement system should be calibrated to account for instrument noise floor and nonlinearities.

2. Oscillator Phase Noise Contributions
2.1 Oscillator Phase Noise Contributions
The phase noise spectrum of an oscillator is determined by various noise processes that modulate the oscillator's frequency. These contributions can be categorized based on their physical origins and their frequency dependence relative to the carrier.
Leeson's Model and Fundamental Noise Processes
The modified Leeson's equation provides a framework for understanding oscillator phase noise:
where:
- F is the oscillator noise figure
- k is Boltzmann's constant
- T is temperature in Kelvin
- Psig is the signal power
- f0 is the oscillation frequency
- QL is the loaded quality factor
- fm is the offset frequency
- fc is the flicker noise corner frequency
White Noise Floor
At large offset frequencies (fm ≫ fc), the phase noise becomes dominated by thermal noise, creating a noise floor:
This represents the fundamental limit set by thermal noise in the active devices and resonator losses.
Flicker Noise Upconversion
Close to the carrier (fm < fc), flicker (1/f) noise dominates due to:
- Active device low-frequency noise upconversion
- Nonlinear capacitance modulation
- Bias circuit fluctuations
The flicker noise contribution follows a 1/fm3 slope below the corner frequency.
Resonator Quality Factor Effects
The loaded Q (QL) of the resonator critically determines the phase noise slope between the flicker and thermal noise regions:
High-Q resonators (e.g., crystal, dielectric) provide steeper roll-off (1/fm2) compared to low-Q LC tanks.
Nonlinear Contributions
Practical oscillators exhibit additional phase noise mechanisms:
- AM-to-PM conversion: Amplitude fluctuations converted to phase noise through nonlinearities
- Harmonic mixing: Noise around harmonics mixing down to fundamental
- Cyclostationary noise: Time-varying noise statistics during oscillation

2.2 Phase Noise from PLL Components
Phase noise in a phase-locked loop (PLL) arises from the cumulative contributions of its individual components: the reference oscillator, phase-frequency detector (PFD), charge pump (CP), loop filter, voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO), and frequency dividers. Each component introduces noise that propagates through the loop, shaping the overall phase noise profile. Understanding these contributions is critical for optimizing PLL designs in high-frequency applications such as wireless communications and radar systems.
Reference Oscillator Noise
The reference oscillator sets the baseline phase noise floor. Its noise, typically modeled as a power-law spectrum, is multiplied by the PLL's N divider ratio when upconverted to the output frequency. For a reference with single-sideband (SSB) phase noise Lref(f), the output-referred noise becomes:
where f is the offset frequency from the carrier. Low-noise crystal oscillators (e.g., OCXOs) are preferred for minimizing this contribution.
Phase-Frequency Detector and Charge Pump Noise
The PFD/CP combination introduces broadband noise due to switching jitter and current mismatches. This noise is dominant at small offset frequencies (f < fc, where fc is the loop bandwidth). The SSB phase noise density can be approximated as:
where Δ̅t2 is the timing jitter variance, qcp is the CP noise charge, Icp is the CP current, and Kϕ is the PFD gain in volts/radian.
Voltage-Controlled Oscillator Noise
The VCO's phase noise dominates at large offsets (f > fc) due to its high sensitivity to thermal and flicker noise. Leeson's model describes its SSB phase noise as:
Here, F is the noise figure, QL is the loaded quality factor, and f0 is the carrier frequency. VCO noise is attenuated inside the loop bandwidth but remains uncorrected outside it.
Divider Noise
Frequency dividers add phase noise through timing jitter in their flip-flops. For a divider with RMS jitter σj, the output noise scales as:
High-speed dividers in RF PLLs often use current-mode logic (CML) to minimize jitter.
Loop Filter Noise
Thermal noise from loop filter resistors modulates the VCO tuning line. For a filter with impedance Z(f) and equivalent noise resistance Rn, the phase noise contribution is:
where KVCO is the VCO gain in Hz/V. Metal-film resistors and passive filtering reduce this effect.
Noise Transfer Functions
The PLL's closed-loop response shapes each component's noise contribution. The transfer function from a noise source at point x to the output is:
For example, reference noise is high-pass filtered by Href(s) = N · G(s)/(1 + G(s)), while VCO noise is low-pass filtered by HVCO(s) = 1/(1 + G(s)), where G(s) is the open-loop gain.

2.3 Impact of Reference Clock Noise
The phase noise of a frequency synthesizer is critically influenced by the noise characteristics of its reference clock. The reference oscillator's phase noise is multiplied by the frequency division ratio N in a phase-locked loop (PLL), directly scaling the synthesizer's output phase noise. This relationship is described by:
where f is the offset frequency, ℒref(f) is the reference clock's phase noise, and ℒout(f) is the output phase noise. The logarithmic scaling means that higher multiplication factors exacerbate reference clock noise.
Noise Transfer Function in PLLs
The PLL's closed-loop transfer function governs how reference noise propagates to the output. Within the loop bandwidth, reference noise dominates, while outside this region, the voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) noise becomes primary. The transfer function for reference noise is:
where KPD is the phase detector gain, KVCO is the VCO gain, and s is the Laplace variable. This low-pass characteristic means reference noise is most impactful at offsets less than the loop bandwidth.
Practical Implications
In high-performance synthesizers, minimizing reference clock noise is essential. For example:
- Crystal oscillators (XO) typically offer phase noise of -150 dBc/Hz at 10 kHz offset. A multiplication factor of 1000 would degrade this to -90 dBc/Hz.
- Oven-controlled oscillators (OCXO) provide better stability but may still limit ultra-low-noise designs when high N is required.
Advanced techniques like fractional-N synthesis reduce the effective N, mitigating reference noise multiplication. However, spurious tones introduced by fractional division must be carefully managed.
Case Study: GPS Disciplined Oscillators
GPS-disciplined oscillators leverage atomic-clock-grade references via satellite signals, achieving phase noise below -170 dBc/Hz at 1 Hz offset. When used in synthesizers for radar or communications, their ultra-low noise enables high spectral purity despite large N values.
For instance, a 10 GHz synthesizer with a 10 MHz GPS reference (N = 1000) would see its reference noise floor rise by 60 dB. With a -170 dBc/Hz reference, the output noise remains below -110 dBc/Hz—sufficient for millimeter-wave applications.

3. Frequency Domain Analysis
3.1 Frequency Domain Analysis
Phase noise in frequency synthesizers is most rigorously analyzed in the frequency domain, where spectral power density reveals fluctuations around the carrier frequency. The single-sided phase noise power spectral density (PSD), denoted as ℒ(f), is defined as the ratio of noise power in a 1 Hz bandwidth at an offset frequency f from the carrier to the total signal power:
where Sϕ(f) is the double-sided PSD of phase fluctuations. This representation is particularly useful because it isolates phase noise from amplitude noise, which is typically negligible in well-designed oscillators.
Leeson’s Model and Its Modifications
Leeson’s equation provides a foundational model for phase noise in oscillators, describing the noise spectrum as a combination of flicker noise (1/f), white noise, and the resonator’s quality factor (Q):
Here, F is the noise figure, k is Boltzmann’s constant, T is temperature, Ps is the signal power, f0 is the carrier frequency, and fc is the flicker noise corner frequency. Modern refinements account for nonlinear effects and cyclostationary noise sources, but Leeson’s model remains a cornerstone for initial design.
Phase Noise Measurement Techniques
Frequency domain analysis typically employs a phase noise analyzer or a spectrum analyzer with a dedicated phase noise measurement suite. Key methods include:
- Direct Spectrum Analysis: Measures the power spectrum directly but suffers from limited dynamic range due to the analyzer’s inherent noise floor.
- Phase Detector Method: Uses a reference oscillator and a mixer to downconvert phase fluctuations to baseband, enabling high-resolution measurements.
- Delay-Line Discriminator: Converts frequency fluctuations into voltage variations, suitable for ultra-low phase noise systems.
Impact of Frequency Synthesis on Phase Noise
In frequency synthesizers, phase noise is exacerbated by the multiplication process. If the output frequency fout is derived from a reference fref via a multiplier N, the phase noise increases by 20 logN:
This degradation underscores the importance of low-noise reference oscillators in phase-locked loops (PLLs). Advanced techniques like fractional-N synthesis and delta-sigma modulation mitigate this by reducing the effective multiplication factor.
Phase Noise in Practical Systems
In communication systems, phase noise corrupts constellation diagrams, increasing bit error rates (BER). In radar applications, it limits target resolution and dynamic range. For instance, a synthesizer with ℒ(f) = −100 dBc/Hz at 10 kHz offset in a 5G system may introduce unacceptable error vector magnitude (EVM) if not compensated.
The following diagram illustrates a typical phase noise profile of a frequency synthesizer, showing regions dominated by flicker noise, white noise, and the resonator’s roll-off:

3.2 Time Domain Analysis
Phase noise in frequency synthesizers can be analyzed in the time domain by examining the statistical properties of timing jitter. The instantaneous phase deviation φ(t) of an oscillator can be modeled as a random process, where the time-dependent fluctuations manifest as phase noise. The relationship between phase noise and timing jitter is fundamental for understanding oscillator stability.
Jitter and Phase Noise Relationship
Timing jitter Δt represents the deviation in zero-crossing times of an oscillator's output. For a sinusoidal signal with frequency f₀, the phase deviation Δφ relates to jitter as:
Root-mean-square (RMS) jitter σₜ is a critical metric in time domain analysis, obtained by integrating the phase noise spectral density Sφ(f) over the offset frequency range:
where f₁ and f₂ define the integration bandwidth. This equation demonstrates how phase noise translates directly into measurable timing instability.
Allan Variance for Oscillator Stability
In the time domain, the Allan variance σy²(τ) provides a measure of frequency stability over different averaging times τ. For phase noise dominated by white noise, the Allan variance relates to the phase noise spectral density as:
This formulation is particularly useful for characterizing long-term stability in frequency synthesizers, where flicker noise and random walk processes become significant.
Practical Measurement Techniques
Time domain measurements typically employ high-resolution time interval analyzers or phase detectors to capture zero-crossing variations. Key steps include:
- Direct jitter measurement: Using a reference clock and time-to-digital converter (TDC) to record timing deviations.
- Phase detector methods: Mixing the oscillator output with a reference signal to extract phase error voltage.
- Statistical analysis: Computing histograms and RMS values from acquired time-stamp data.
These techniques complement frequency domain measurements, providing insights into short-term stability and transient behavior that may not be apparent in spectral analysis alone.
Case Study: PLL-Based Synthesizer Jitter
In phase-locked loop (PLL) frequency synthesizers, the voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) contributes significantly to output jitter. The closed-loop transfer function modifies the VCO's inherent phase noise, resulting in an output jitter spectrum given by:
where H(f) is the PLL's phase transfer function. This illustrates how loop bandwidth selection critically impacts time domain performance.

3.3 Simulation and Modeling Approaches
Time-Domain vs. Frequency-Domain Simulations
Phase noise analysis in frequency synthesizers can be performed in either the time or frequency domain, each with distinct advantages. Time-domain simulations, often executed using SPICE-like tools, solve nonlinear differential equations directly, capturing transient effects and nonlinearities accurately. However, they are computationally expensive for long settling times or high-Q systems. Frequency-domain methods, such as harmonic balance, linearize the system around a steady-state solution, enabling efficient noise analysis but potentially missing strong nonlinear interactions.
The choice between domains depends on the synthesizer architecture. Integer-N synthesizers with moderate bandwidths may be analyzed effectively in the frequency domain, while fractional-N or wideband synthesizers with significant nonlinear behavior often require time-domain approaches.
Phase-Domain Behavioral Modeling
Phase-domain models abstract the voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) and phase-locked loop (PLL) components into phase transfer functions, dramatically reducing simulation time while maintaining accuracy for phase noise prediction. The VCO is modeled as an integrator in the phase domain:
where ϕout is the output phase, KVCO is the tuning sensitivity in rad/s/V, and ϕnoise represents the accumulated phase noise. This approach enables rapid exploration of loop filter bandwidth effects on phase noise without simulating every RF cycle.
Nonlinear Noise Modeling
Traditional linear phase noise models fail to capture critical phenomena in synthesizers:
- Cyclostationary noise in oscillators, where noise sensitivity varies periodically with the oscillation waveform
- Noise folding in fractional-N dividers due to modulation sequences
- AM-to-PM conversion in VCOs with amplitude-dependent frequency shifts
The impulse sensitivity function (ISF) framework extends linear models to handle these effects:
where Γ(t) is the periodic ISF, ∂ϕ/∂q represents phase sensitivity to charge perturbations, and h(t) is the impulse response. This model accurately predicts how device noise converts to phase noise through nonlinear mechanisms.
Mixed-Signal Co-Simulation
Modern frequency synthesizers combine analog PLLs with digital ΣΔ modulators and control logic, necessitating mixed-signal simulation strategies. Key approaches include:
- Event-driven digital simulation coupled with continuous-time analog solvers
- Reduced-order modeling of analog components for faster digital co-simulation
- Jitter injection techniques that model clock uncertainty without full transistor-level simulation
Tools like Cadence Virtuoso AMS Designer or Synopsys HSPICE RF provide specialized cosimulation capabilities for these heterogeneous systems, enabling accurate prediction of digital switching noise coupling into sensitive analog nodes.
Monte Carlo and Corner Analysis
Process variations significantly impact phase noise performance through:
- VCO gain (KVCO) spread affecting loop dynamics
- Varactor Q-factor variations changing tank loss
- Transistor mismatch altering noise contributions
Statistical simulation methods assess these effects:
where xi represents process parameters with variations Δxi. Advanced techniques like importance sampling reduce the required simulation count while maintaining accuracy in the tails of the distribution.
Verification Against Measurement
All simulation models require correlation with silicon measurements. Key validation steps include:
- Extracting device noise parameters (Fmin, Rn) from transistor S-parameter and noise measurements
- Calibrating package and interconnect models using TDR/TDT measurements
- Validating phase noise predictions against high-sensitivity spectrum analyzer measurements
Discrepancies often reveal unmodeled effects like substrate noise coupling or power supply modulation that must be incorporated into subsequent simulation iterations.

4. Optimizing Oscillator Design
4.1 Optimizing Oscillator Design
Fundamental Trade-offs in Oscillator Topologies
The phase noise performance of an oscillator is governed by the Leeson effect, which describes the relationship between quality factor (Q), carrier power, and noise floor. The modified Leeson equation for phase noise £(fm) at offset frequency fm is:
where F is the noise figure, QL the loaded quality factor, and fc the flicker noise corner. Key design parameters include:
- Q-factor maximization: Higher Q reduces close-in phase noise but requires careful impedance matching
- Active device selection: BJTs typically outperform FETs in flicker noise characteristics below 1 MHz offset
- Topology choice: Clapp oscillators achieve better Q than Colpitts for frequencies above 500 MHz
Resonator Design Techniques
The resonator's unloaded quality factor Qu directly impacts phase noise. For a parallel LC tank:
Practical implementations use:
- High-Q inductors: Air-core or suspended stripline designs with Q > 200 at 2 GHz
- Low-loss capacitors: Temperature-stable NP0/C0G dielectrics with ESR < 50 mΩ
- Varactor optimization: Hyperabrupt junctions provide wider tuning but degrade Q by 30-50% compared to MOS varactors
Active Device Biasing Strategies
Optimal bias points minimize both thermal and flicker noise contributions:
where γ is the channel noise coefficient and Kf the flicker noise constant. Practical considerations include:
- Current density: 0.1-0.3 mA/μm for SiGe HBTs balances noise and linearity
- Voltage headroom: ≥ 2VDSAT prevents AM-to-PM conversion in CMOS designs
- Tail current filtering: RC networks with τ ≥ 10/f0 suppress common-mode noise
Layout Considerations for Phase Noise Reduction
Parasitic mitigation techniques include:
- Ground plane segmentation: Separate analog/RF grounds using λ/20 isolation gaps
- Substrate shielding: Deep n-well implants reduce capacitive coupling by 15-20 dB
- Symmetrical routing: Matched transmission line lengths < λ/100 minimize quadrature errors
4.2 Improving PLL Loop Filter Performance
The loop filter in a phase-locked loop (PLL) is critical in determining phase noise, settling time, and spurious suppression. Optimizing its design involves balancing stability, bandwidth, and noise contributions while accounting for real-world parasitics.
Loop Filter Transfer Function and Stability
A second-order passive RC loop filter is commonly used for its simplicity and robustness. Its transfer function is given by:
where τ2 = R2C2 and τ1 = R1C1. The third pole (τ3) is introduced to suppress high-frequency ripple. To ensure stability, the phase margin (φm) must satisfy:
where ωc is the crossover frequency. A phase margin below 45° risks peaking in the phase noise profile and prolonged settling.
Noise Optimization Techniques
Thermal noise from resistors directly impacts in-band phase noise. The noise power spectral density (PSD) of the loop filter is:
where Req is the equivalent noise resistance. To minimize this:
- Reduce R1 and R2 by scaling up capacitors, but this trades off with increased die area.
- Use active filters with low-noise op-amps for high-Q systems, though they introduce additional flicker noise.
- Employ differential topologies to cancel common-mode noise.
Spurious Suppression
Charge-pump leakage and reference feedthrough generate spurs at the reference frequency (fref). The attenuation at fref is governed by:
To improve spur rejection:
- Add a fourth pole (e.g., a small capacitor C3 in parallel with R2) without compromising stability.
- Optimize charge-pump matching to minimize leakage currents.
Advanced Filter Topologies
For ultra-low phase noise applications, higher-order filters or adaptive bandwidth techniques are employed:
- Active PI filters with programmable gain adjust damping factor dynamically.
- Switched-capacitor filters enable discrete tuning of loop bandwidth without resistor noise penalties.

4.3 Advanced Techniques: Fractional-N Synthesis and Dithering
Fractional-N Synthesis
Traditional integer-N phase-locked loops (PLLs) suffer from a fundamental trade-off between frequency resolution and loop bandwidth. Fractional-N synthesis overcomes this limitation by allowing non-integer division ratios, enabling fine frequency steps without compromising loop dynamics. The technique involves dynamically switching the division ratio between two integers (N and N+1) in a controlled sequence, producing an effective fractional division ratio N + α, where 0 ≤ α < 1.
The time-averaged output frequency fout is given by:
where fref is the reference frequency. The fractional part α is implemented using a digital accumulator that overflows periodically, triggering a modulus controller to adjust the divider. However, this introduces quantization error, manifesting as spurious tones at offsets of αfref and its harmonics.
Sigma-Delta Modulation for Spur Reduction
To mitigate fractional spurs, sigma-delta (ΣΔ) modulation is employed. A ΣΔ modulator shapes the quantization noise, pushing it to higher frequencies where the PLL’s low-pass characteristic attenuates it. An M-th order ΣΔ modulator suppresses close-in phase noise while increasing high-frequency noise, which is filtered by the loop.
The phase noise power spectral density (PSD) due to ΣΔ quantization is:
where M is the modulator order. Higher-order modulators improve in-band noise at the cost of increased out-of-band noise, necessitating careful loop filter design.
Dithering Techniques
Dithering randomizes the divider switching sequence, converting spurious tones into broadband noise. A pseudo-random number generator (PRNG) or a low-frequency dither signal is injected into the ΣΔ modulator to break periodicity. The resulting phase noise follows:
where Sϕ(f) is the phase noise PSD. Optimal dither amplitude balances spur suppression with added noise floor.
Practical Implementation Considerations
- Loop Bandwidth: Must be wide enough to suppress high-frequency ΣΔ noise but narrow enough to avoid reference feedthrough.
- Modulator Order: Typically 3rd or 4th order for a balance between complexity and performance.
- Dither Injection: Should be applied at the modulator input to avoid correlation artifacts.
Modern fractional-N synthesizers, such as those in 5G transceivers, leverage these techniques to achieve sub-Hz resolution with phase noise below −100 dBc/Hz at 1 kHz offset.

5. Phase Noise in Wireless Communication Systems
5.1 Phase Noise in Wireless Communication Systems
Phase noise is a critical impairment in wireless communication systems, degrading signal integrity and limiting spectral efficiency. It manifests as random fluctuations in the phase of an oscillator's output signal, introducing jitter and broadening the spectral linewidth. The impact is particularly severe in high-frequency systems, where even small phase deviations can lead to significant inter-carrier interference (ICI) in orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) systems or increased bit error rates (BER) in phase-modulated schemes like QPSK or QAM.
Mathematical Characterization of Phase Noise
The phase noise of an oscillator is typically characterized in the frequency domain by the single-sideband (SSB) phase noise power spectral density (PSD), denoted as L(f), defined as:
where PSSB(f0 + f, 1 Hz) is the power in a 1 Hz bandwidth at an offset frequency f from the carrier frequency f0, and Pcarrier is the total carrier power. The logarithmic scale (dBc/Hz) is used due to the wide dynamic range of phase noise power.
Impact on Wireless System Performance
In coherent communication systems, phase noise introduces two primary effects:
- Common phase error (CPE): A rotation of the entire constellation due to slow phase variations, which can be corrected using pilot symbols.
- Inter-carrier interference (ICI): Fast phase variations cause spectral leakage between subcarriers in multi-carrier systems, degrading the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR).
The degradation in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to phase noise in an OFDM system can be approximated by:
where Δfrms is the root-mean-square (rms) frequency deviation and Ts is the symbol duration.
Phase Noise in Frequency Synthesizers
Frequency synthesizers, particularly phase-locked loops (PLLs), are major contributors to phase noise in wireless transceivers. The total output phase noise ϕout(f) of a PLL is a combination of:
- Reference oscillator noise
- Voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) noise
- Phase detector and divider noise
- Loop filter noise
The PLL's transfer function shapes the phase noise contributions differently across the offset frequencies:
where H(f) is the PLL's closed-loop transfer function.
Mitigation Techniques
Several techniques are employed to mitigate phase noise in wireless systems:
- Improved oscillator design: High-Q resonators (e.g., BAW, SAW) reduce close-in phase noise.
- Digital signal processing: Pilot-aided phase tracking and ICI cancellation algorithms compensate for phase noise effects.
- Advanced PLL architectures: Fractional-N synthesizers with sigma-delta modulation achieve fine frequency resolution while suppressing quantization noise.
In millimeter-wave systems, where phase noise is more severe, techniques like injection locking and sub-sampling PLLs are increasingly used to achieve ultra-low phase noise performance.

5.2 Impact on Radar and Satellite Systems
Phase noise in frequency synthesizers critically degrades the performance of radar and satellite communication systems by introducing timing jitter and spectral spreading. In radar systems, phase noise corrupts the Doppler resolution, limiting the ability to distinguish closely spaced targets. The phase noise-induced jitter in the local oscillator (LO) manifests as a broadening of the radar's clutter spectrum, reducing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and increasing false alarm rates.
Mathematical Analysis of Phase Noise in Radar Systems
The phase noise power spectral density (PSD), \( \mathcal{L}(f) \), directly impacts the radar's phase error variance \( \sigma_{\phi}^2 \):
where \( f_{\text{min}} \) and \( f_{\text{max}} \) define the offset frequency range of interest. For a pulsed radar system, the phase noise-induced timing jitter \( \sigma_t \) is:
Here, \( f_0 \) is the carrier frequency. Excessive jitter smears the radar's pulse compression gain, degrading range resolution.
Satellite Communication Systems
In satellite transponders, phase noise causes inter-carrier interference (ICI) in multi-carrier modulation schemes like OFDM. The resulting error vector magnitude (EVM) degradation is given by:
where \( T_s \) is the symbol duration. For geostationary satellites, even sub-picosecond jitter can corrupt high-order QAM constellations.
Case Study: Phase Noise in Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)
In SAR systems, phase noise introduces azimuth smearing. The allowable integrated phase noise for a resolution \( \delta x \) is:
where \( \lambda \) is the radar wavelength. Modern SAR systems operating at Ka-band (e.g., 35 GHz) require synthesizers with \( \mathcal{L}(1\,\text{kHz}) < -100\,\text{dBc/Hz} \) to maintain sub-meter resolution.
Mitigation Techniques
Advanced frequency synthesizers employ:
- Low-noise dielectric resonator oscillators (DROs) for base generation
- Fractional-N PLLs with dithering to suppress fractional spurs
- Optical frequency division for ultra-low phase noise at microwave frequencies
The phase noise requirements for next-generation satellite constellations (e.g., LEO broadband systems) now push synthesizer designs beyond -110 dBc/Hz at 100 Hz offset for 28 GHz user links.
5.3 Case Study: Low-Noise Frequency Synthesizer Design
Design Constraints and Objectives
Low-noise frequency synthesizers are critical in applications such as radar systems, high-speed communication, and atomic clocks, where phase noise directly impacts system performance. The primary objective is to minimize phase noise while maintaining frequency agility and stability. Key constraints include:
- Phase noise below -110 dBc/Hz at 10 kHz offset for a 10 GHz carrier
- Frequency switching time under 50 µs
- Power consumption below 2 W
- Integration with a 65 nm CMOS process
Phase-Locked Loop (PLL) Architecture Selection
For ultra-low phase noise, a fractional-N PLL with a high-quality voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) and optimized loop filter is selected. The Leeson's equation provides the theoretical phase noise floor:
where F is the noise figure, k is Boltzmann's constant, T is temperature, Psig is signal power, f0 is carrier frequency, Q is resonator quality factor, and fc is flicker noise corner frequency.
VCO Design Trade-offs
The VCO dominates close-in phase noise performance. A differential LC-tank topology is chosen for its superior phase noise characteristics. The tank impedance Ztank and effective parallel resistance Rp are given by:
Inductor optimization involves balancing between Q (typically 15-25 in CMOS) and area constraints. Patterned ground shields and thick top-metal layers are employed to minimize substrate losses.
Loop Filter Optimization
The third-order passive loop filter components are calculated based on the desired bandwidth (100 kHz) and phase margin (50°):
where T1 and T2 are time constants derived from the phase margin requirements, Icp is charge pump current, KVCO is VCO gain, and N is the division ratio.
Noise Contributions Analysis
The total phase noise power spectral density comprises contributions from various components:
The reference oscillator contributes primarily to noise beyond the loop bandwidth, while the VCO dominates inside the loop bandwidth. The charge pump noise is most significant at mid-range offsets (1-100 kHz).
Implementation Results
The implemented synthesizer in 65 nm CMOS achieves:
- -98 dBc/Hz at 1 kHz offset
- -122 dBc/Hz at 100 kHz offset
- -145 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset
- 45 µs switching time between adjacent channels
- 1.8 W power consumption at 1.2 V supply
The phase noise performance approaches the theoretical limit set by the VCO's Q factor and the reference oscillator's noise floor. Further improvements would require either higher-Q passive components (e.g., MEMS resonators) or advanced noise cancellation techniques.

6. Key Research Papers and Articles
6.1 Key Research Papers and Articles
- PDF On the Improvement of Phase Noise in Wideband Frequency Synthesizers — ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF PHASE NOISE IN WIDEBAND FREQUENCY SYNTHESIZERS by Pandelani Reuben Munyai Supervisor(s): Prof. B.J.T Maharaj Department: Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering University: University of Pretoria Degree: Master of Engineering (Electronic Engineering) Keywords: Phase noise, phase error, phase noise tracking, phase ...
- PDF Integrated Frequency Synthesizers for Wireless Systems — Contents Preface pagevii Acknowledgments viii 1 Local oscillator requirements 1 1.1 AM and PM signals 2 1.2 Effect of phase noise and spurs 6 1.3 Frequency accuracy 9 1.4 Switching speed 12 1.5 References 12 2 Phase-locked loops 14 2.1 Basics 14 2.2 PLL for frequency synthesis 23 2.3 Discrete-time and non-linearity effects 32 2.4 Spectral purity: spurs and phase noise 38 2.5 References 47
- ADPLL design parameters determinations through noise modeling — When α = 2 − 2 and β = 2 − 7, the maximum in band phase noise is − 82 dBc / Hz, the phase noise at 1 MHz frequency offset is − 111 dBc / Hz and the locking time is 20.2 μ s. Apparently, there is a trade off among ADPLL locking time, maximum in band phase noise and phase noise at specific frequency offset (i.e. frequency offset at 1 ...
- PDF The Reduction and Cancellation of Phase Noise in Digital Frequency ... — Circuit and system techniques for reducing phase noise in frequency synthesizers, and cancelling phase noise effect in quadrature receivers are presented. Phase noise performance of digital phase-locked loops (PLLs) is limited by the time resolution of time-to-digital converters (TDC). In contrast to TDCs in the past that concentrate
- PDF Reducing Phase Noise and Spurious Tones in Fractional-n Synthesizers ... — which achieves this is called an integer-N frequency synthesizer. The main challenge in the design of integer-N synthesizers is to reduce phase noise introduced by circuitry while achieving a needed frequency resolution. Noise can be spectrally spread by conversions in the loop which are non-linear, so the strategy to reduce noise is two-fold.
- PDF Analysis and improvement of phase noise performance of a PLL -based RF ... — The IEEE definition of phase noise was in the beginning of Section2.1defined by half the double-sideband spectral density. By as-suming that the noise spectrum is symmetric around the carrier frequency, i.e. the double-sideband noise power is twice the noise power in a single-sideband, the phase noisecanbeexpressedas L = SDSB/2 Pc = SSSB Pc ...
- PDF Predicting the Phase Noise and Jitter of PLL-Based Frequency Synthesizers — 1.1 Frequency Synthesis The focus of this paper is frequency synthesis. The block diagram of a PLL operating as a frequency synthesizer is shown in Figure 1 [8]. It consists of a reference oscillator (OSC), a phase/frequency detector (PFD), a charge pump (CP), a loop filter (LF), a volt-age-controlled oscillator (VCO), and two frequency ...
- (PDF) A Guide to Phase Noise Analysis of Single and Multi-PLL Frequency ... — A Guide to Phase Noise Analysis of Single and Multi-PLL Frequency Synthesizers with LTSpice. April 2021; ... 6. 1. 1 N o i s e ...
- PDF A Guide to Phase Noise Analysis of Single and Multi-PLL Frequency ... — The phase noise spectrum of very low noise oscillators, such as crystal and WSA oscillators, typically have an f 3 characteristic from 100 kHz down to less than 1 Hz, that accounts for the bulk of ...
- PDF Fully-Integrated DLL/PLL-Based CMOS Frequency Synthesizers for Wireless ... — Frequency Synthesizers for Wireless Systems Approved by: ... First of all, I would like to acknowledge the enthusiastic supervision of my research advisor, Professor Emmanouil M. Tentzeris. Without his guidance and encouragement, my ... Measured SSB phase noise of the proposed frequency synthesizer when the
6.2 Recommended Books and Textbooks
- PDF Phase Noise and Frequency Stability in Oscillators — 2 Phase noise in semiconductors and amplifiers 35 2.1 Fundamental noise phenomena 35 2.2 Noise temperature and noise figure 37 2.3 Phase noise and amplitude noise 42 2.4 Phase noise in cascaded amplifiers 49 2.5 Low-flicker amplifiers 52 2.6 Detection of microwave-modulated light 62 Exercises 65 3 Heuristic approach to the Leeson effect 67
- Frequency Synthesizer Design Handbook [PDF] [2n922ke1cnlg] - E-book library — 3.5 Creating Arbitrary Phase Noise Spectra in a Digital Signal Processing Environment 69 3.6 Phase Noise in Devices 71 3.6.1 Digital Frequency Dividers 71 3.6.2 Phase Detector Phase Noise Performance 81 3.6.3 Low-Noise Electronic Design 84 3.6.4 Noise Sources in Lead-Lag Loop Filters 87 3.6.5 Noise in Components 89 3.6.6 Low-Noise Oscillator ...
- PDF Predicting the Phase Noise and Jitter of PLL-Based Frequency Synthesizers — 2 Phase-Domain Model 6 2.1 Small-Signal Stability 9 2.2 Noise Transfer Functions 9 2.3 Noise Model 11 3 Oscillators 11 3.1 Oscillator Phase Noise 12 3.2 Characterizing Oscillator Phase Noise 14 3.3 Phase-Domain Models for the Oscillators 16 4 Loop Filter 17 5 Phase Detector and Charge Pump 18 6 Frequency Dividers 19 6.1 Cyclostationary Noise ...
- PDF Integrated Frequency Synthesizers for Wireless Systems — Contents Preface pagevii Acknowledgments viii 1 Local oscillator requirements 1 1.1 AM and PM signals 2 1.2 Effect of phase noise and spurs 6 1.3 Frequency accuracy 9 1.4 Switching speed 12 1.5 References 12 2 Phase-locked loops 14 2.1 Basics 14 2.2 PLL for frequency synthesis 23 2.3 Discrete-time and non-linearity effects 32 2.4 Spectral purity: spurs and phase noise 38 2.5 References 47
- PDF Understanding Jitter and Phase Noise - api.pageplace.de — 3.1.5 Definition of Phase Noise 51 3.2 From Phase Noise to Jitter 52 3.2.1 Absolute Jitter 52 3.2.2 N-Period and Period Jitter 59 3.3 Spectral Spurious Tones and Jitter 65 3.4 Superposition of Different Spectral Components 66 3.5 Summary of Mathematical Relationships Between Jitter and Phase Noise 68 4 Jitter and Phase Noise in Circuits 69
- PDF Phase Lock Loops and Frequency Synthesis — 10.4.1 Digital Phase-locked Loops of the First Order 249 10.4.2 Digital Phase-locked Loops of the Second Order 250 10.5 Transient Response Evaluation for Steady and Periodic Changes of Input Phase and Frequency 252 10.6 Loop Noise Bandwidth of Digital PLLs 253 References 254. 11 PLLs in Frequency Synthesis 255
- Advanced Frequency Synthesis by Phase Lock | Wiley — 1.1 Phase-Locked Synthesizer 2. 1.2 Fractional-N Frequency Synthesis 3. 1.3 Representing a Change in Divide Number 3. 1.4 Units 5. 1.5 Representing Phase Noise 5. 1.6 Phase Noise at the Synthesizer Output 7. 1.7 Observing the Output Spectrum 7. 2 Fractional-N and Basic ΣΔ Synthesizers 9. 2.1 First-Order Fractional-N 9. 2.1.1 Canceling ...
- ADVANCED FREQUENCY SYNTHESIS BY PHASE LOCK - Wiley Online Library — 1.1 Phase-Locked Synthesizer / 2 1.2 Fractional-N Frequency Synthesis / 3 1.3 Representing a Change in Divide Number / 3 1.4 Units / 5 1.5 Representing Phase Noise / 5 1.6 Phase Noise at the Synthesizer Output / 7 1.7 Observing the Output Spectrum / 7 2 FRACTIONAL-N AND BASIC SD SYNTHESIZERS 9 2.1 First-Order Fractional-N / 9
- PDF A Guide to Phase Noise Analysis of Single and Multi-PLL Frequency ... — The random function ˚(t) adds phase noise to the signal. Phase noise is of great concern to designers of frequency synthesizers because it can seriously limit the performance of systems such as ...
- Frequency Synthesizers: Concept to Product (Artech House Microwave ... — The book also delves into other aspects of synthesizer design you will more than likely not find in another book, such as control interfaces. There is a section devoted to describing the different control interfaces that could be used with synthesizer design (ie RS-232, SPI, PXI, LXI, etc).
6.3 Online Resources and Tools
- PDF Predicting the Phase Noise and Jitter of PLL-Based Frequency Synthesizers — 3.1 Oscillator Phase Noise 12 3.2 Characterizing Oscillator Phase Noise 14 3.3 Phase-Domain Models for the Oscillators 16 4 Loop Filter 17 5 Phase Detector and Charge Pump 18 6 Frequency Dividers 19 6.1 Cyclostationary Noise. 19 6.2 Converting to Phase Noise 21 6.3 Phase-Domain Model for Dividers 21 7 Fractional-N Synthesis 22 8 Jitter 24
- PDF Predicting the Phase Noise and Jitter of PLL-Based Frequency Synthesizers — 1.5 Predicting Noise in PLLs 5 2 Phase-Domain Model 6 2.1 Small-Signal Stability 9 2.2 Noise Transfer Functions 9 2.3 Noise Model 11 3 Oscillators 12 3.1 Oscillator Phase Noise 12 3.2 Characterizing Oscillator Phase Noise 14 3.3 Phase-Domain Models for the Oscillators 16 4 Loop Filter 17 5 Phase Detector and Charge Pump 17 6 Frequency Dividers 18
- PDF Phase Noise and Frequency Stability in Oscillators — 2 Phase noise in semiconductors and amplifiers 35 2.1 Fundamental noise phenomena 35 2.2 Noise temperature and noise figure 37 2.3 Phase noise and amplitude noise 42 2.4 Phase noise in cascaded amplifiers 49 2.5 Low-flicker amplifiers 52 2.6 Detection of microwave-modulated light 62 Exercises 65 3 Heuristic approach to the Leeson effect 67
- PDF On the Improvement of Phase Noise in Wideband Frequency Synthesizers — ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF PHASE NOISE IN WIDEBAND FREQUENCY SYNTHESIZERS by Pandelani Reuben Munyai Supervisor(s): Prof. B.J.T Maharaj Department: Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering University: University of Pretoria Degree: Master of Engineering (Electronic Engineering) Keywords: Phase noise, phase error, phase noise tracking, phase ...
- PDF Integrated Frequency Synthesizers for Wireless Systems — Contents Preface pagevii Acknowledgments viii 1 Local oscillator requirements 1 1.1 AM and PM signals 2 1.2 Effect of phase noise and spurs 6 1.3 Frequency accuracy 9 1.4 Switching speed 12 1.5 References 12 2 Phase-locked loops 14 2.1 Basics 14 2.2 PLL for frequency synthesis 23 2.3 Discrete-time and non-linearity effects 32 2.4 Spectral purity: spurs and phase noise 38 2.5 References 47
- PDF ISSCC 2019 / SESSION 16 / FREQUENCY SYNTHESIZERS / 16 - iczhiku.com — phase noise. The reference frequency and multiples lie at the nulls of the sample-and-hold sinc() frequency response [8], allowing the loop bandwidth to be widened to suppress the LCO noise. Thus, this LCO PLL achieves a 174fs rms jitter and a -251dB FoM. The fractional frequency is generated by a Type-II charge-
- Oscillator Phase Noise - Theory and Prediction - Academia.edu — Example: The block diagram of the phase-locked loop noise model is illustrated Figure 5.2 where each of the constituent component noise sources are identified in accordance with the following symbols and text: out - Output RMS phase noise The predicted phase noise of an oscillator constructed from an InGaP HBT using a resonator with loaded ...
- (PDF) A Guide to Phase Noise Analysis of Single and Multi-PLL Frequency ... — A Guide to Phase Noise Analysis of Single and Multi-PLL Frequency Synthesizers with LTSpice. April 2021; ... 6. 3 P h a s e d e l a y ...
- Fractional N Synthesizer Architectures With Digital Phase Detection — Figure 3.13 : Calculating the output phase noise for a dual loop (a) System overview (b) Converted into a single loop (c) overall transfer function, simplified..... 54 Figure 4.1 : A PLL is often used to filter noise sources. In particular, high frequency
- PDF A Guide to Phase Noise Analysis of Single and Multi-PLL Frequency ... — The phase noise spectrum of very low noise oscillators, such as crystal and WSA oscillators, typically have an f 3 characteristic from 100 kHz down to less than 1 Hz, that accounts for the bulk of ...






