infrared beam proximity detector


Rating: 0.00 / 5 
Alarm Circuits / Security Circuits
his circuit can be used as an Infrared beam barrier as well as a proximity detector. The circuit uses the very popular Sharp IR module (Vishay module can also be used). The pin nos. shown in the circuit are for the Sharp & VIshay modules. For other modules please refer to their respective datasheets. The receiver consists of a 555 timer IC working as an oscillator at about 38Khz (also works from 36kHz to 40kHz) which has to be adjusted using the 10K preset. The duty cycle of the IR beam is about 10%. This allows us to pass more current through the LEDS thus achieving a longer range.
infrared beam proximity detector - schematic

The receiver uses a sharp IR module. When the IR beam from the transmitter falls on the IR module, the output is activated which activates the relay and de-activated when the beam is obstructed. The relay contacts can be used to turn ON/OFF alarms, lights etc. The 10K preset should be adjusted until the receiver detects the IR beam. The circuit can also be used as a proximity sensor, i.e to detect objects in front of the device without obstructing a IR beam. For this the LEDs should be pointed in the same direction as the IR module and at the same level. The suggested arrangement is shown in the circuit diagram. The LEDs should be properly covered with a reflective material like glass or aluminum foils on the sides to avoid the spreading of the IR beam and to get a sharp focus of the beam. When there is nothing in front of them, the IR beam is not reflected onto the module and hence the circuit is not activated. When an object comes near the device, the IR light from the LEDs is reflected by the object onto the module and hence the circuit gets activated. If there still a lot of mis-triggering, use a 1uF or higher capacitor instead of the 0.47uF.


  • Vox
    Vox They've hired a guard and installed cameras, Borchelt said, but they should also be doing other things NAF recommends like installing and shatterproof glass and doing ID checks. And as scary as extremist anti-abortion terrorism can be,&
     6 May 2016
    Daily Mail But when a piece of malware can trigger that fire at four in the morning or unlock your front door for a stranger, your “smart home” suddenly seems pretty dumb. The research community has been loudly warning for y
     3 May 2016
  • depending on your needsIf you're like most American households, you probably have a drawer with old smartphones collecting dust because you upgraded to a newer model. These older smartphones pack quite a bit of processing power
     30 April 2016
  • KARK
    KARK Users for False AlarmsCONWAY, Ark. - The city of Conway revised an ordinance to cut down on the thousands of false sparked by home systems. According to the Conway Police Department, officers responded to 2,900 calls from systems
     28 April 2016
  • WKRG
    WKRG Owners Must Register With City of MobileIf you're a business owner or a homeowner, and you have an , you'll be getting a letter from the city of Mobile asking you to register your with the city. It'll cost you $25 a year for your h
     28 April 2016
  • Calgary Herald
    Calgary Herald What it takes to ing Calgary police to the door when your is going off will soon change, and further changes are coming, revolving around permit, price tag and penalties. The city's alarm services bylaw will change May 15
     26 April 2016
  • Money Talks News (blog)
    Money Talks News (blog) for Your HomeResearch suggests that when a potential burglar believes a home has a , they are much less likely to target that home. And if the burglar eaks into the home and an alarm sounds, insiders say that cri
     26 April 2016
  • micebtn
    Bras from the UK's Marks & Spencer are setting off at airports because of the metal underwiring. The lingerie triggers metal detectors because the M&S as contain a different metal from the type used by other UK high street chains
     20 April 2016
  • The Register-Guard
    BEND — The city of Bend plans to start enforcing false fees after responding to more than 2,000 such calls in each of the past two years. The City Council in 2012 approved fees of $250 for a second false and $500 for a third false <
     11 April 2016


Leave Comment

characters left: